Closing statements get underway
What a long journey we've had together. Clearly the end is in sight. But it's the journey along the way that counts - Those were Robert Campbell's closing words this morning. He spoke from 9:45 to 10:55. We just braked for the mid-morning break. Campbell talked about pressure - the pressure the sheriff's office was under to solve this case and the pressure to win. He talked about how much evidence was ignored. Investigators ignored the medical examiner's opinion Emily died 2 to 4 days before her body was found. They ignored the phone calls Jerry made from the dairy the morning Emily went missing. They ignored Jerry's cell phone records that said he was in and around Sawmills all of Dec. 29, 2005. They ignored witnesses in South Carolina - not showing Bruce Bomar a lineup until a month before the trial and never speaking with Betty Dillard or Tammy Beltcher. Campbell talked about Roy McNeil's inconsistent testimony and the inconsistent emails he sent to Eric Bellas - one email says there was not hit of decomp on the tractor, a second email says there was a hit. Campbell used illustrations. He talked about things the prosecution wanted "left in the box," such as evidence like the rape kit that was never tested or the weather in Duncan, S.C., while Emily was missing and hair samples found in the truck that were never tested. He talked about the burden of proof and the state has not met that. He said the state has not proven behind a reasonable doubt Jerry did this. He said jurors should find Jerry not guilty. He said it is impossible Jerry committed this crime: Phone calls were made from the dairy in the 8 o'clock hour when Antonio Reyes originally said he saw Emily and Jerry go into the woods. Emily was seen with a man that morning, according to Steve Killian. Her truck was last seen at her house by a neighbor at 9 a.m. Jerry sent a fax to McCombs Oil at noon. He made phone calls that hit cell phone towers in the area throughout the day and he was seen at 4:30 at the local gas station by Walter Moore. It is impossible he got to South Carolina and did all those things, Campbell said.
Lisa Dubs will go next. I figure she will talk at least an hour. I bet Bellas goes (if he even gets started before lunch) into the afternoon. The judge said instructions will take 30 minutes. I still believe the jury will begin deliberation today. Hopefully, I will have a better idea at lunch. Be back then. Jerry just stares forward, listening and waiting. Man, this is exciting. It's a packed house. Every row is full. In fact, the deputies said no one else can come into this courtroom. I think everyone wants to know... Guilty or not guilty?
Lisa Dubs will go next. I figure she will talk at least an hour. I bet Bellas goes (if he even gets started before lunch) into the afternoon. The judge said instructions will take 30 minutes. I still believe the jury will begin deliberation today. Hopefully, I will have a better idea at lunch. Be back then. Jerry just stares forward, listening and waiting. Man, this is exciting. It's a packed house. Every row is full. In fact, the deputies said no one else can come into this courtroom. I think everyone wants to know... Guilty or not guilty?
11 Comments:
My gut says "guilty" the proof says "not guilty"...that's the way it is folks...tink out...I'm off to Jamaica...
I'm in agreement with tinkerbell. My gut tells me he did it , but there is so many questions left open. If I was on the jury and from what I've read, I couldn't find him quilty without more proof. I hate to say that but it's true.
Ditto. Gut: guilty. Evidence: not guilty.
What an odd thing. Everyone seems to agree there is no evidence saying Mr. Anderson did this crime, yet they still think he is guilty. Based on what? Rumors? Astrology? The fact they were married? (That probably says more about us than the Andersons.)
My gosh, humans are scary.
Ditto Allison. Damn scary.
If you boil it all down, it's those same "gut" instincts that put Jerry where he's at right now. On trial for his life based on how someone feels as opposed to actual evidence. How anyone could look at the timeline of events presented and still say their "gut" tells them he did it is beyond me. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
observer-that's right-everyone is intitled to their opinions...as we all have done thru this trial...posted our thoughts and opinions
Tinkerbell - I've enjoyed reading all the opinions and "facts" that people have been putting out there. But I still don't understand how, when objectively looking at the timeline, people can still say by a "gut" feeling that he did it.
Emily was at Sawmills Hardware at 7:20, one of her last known sightings was at the Rock Quarry in Lenoir where she paid a bill between 8 and 8:30. Had she driven straight to the dairy from there (not even stopping at the Holiday Convenience Store as testified by Steve Killian) she wouldn't have made it home until closer to 9.
If that's the case and she was murdered at one of the times the Hispanic workers claimed she was killed (which varied but we'll go with 9am for our timeline) then how in the world did Jerry get the truck from Sawmills, NC to Duncan, SC (according to Mapquest it's a one hour and fifty minute drive) and be back to Sawmills for his cell phone to register on a cell phone tower in Connelly Springs at noon.
Had he done it there is no way he could have been back in Granite Falls/Caldwell County until closer to 1 at the earliest. After Emily went missing Jerry never would have had time to get away from friends, family and law enforcement long enough to drive that far.
I just try to look at the facts and take my gut out of the equation. The only thing my gut is good for is telling me when I'm hungry not when someone's killed somebody!
Observer-I also have time & time again ask the same question of how did Jerry get down to SC & back without being missed for 4-5 hours-only conclusion I have is there is someone who helped him and that person is missing in action-
as for the cell phone towers locating his PHONE-not Jerry -his phone-I can leave my phone in Mt. Holly and travel out of the counrty and the towers will say I never left the area. So-I'm not using my "gut feeling" I am rather using common sense-who else would have wanted Emily dead-the mexican who lied on the stand about his true identity-because she wouldn't leave Jerry for him-Personally I don't think that mexican is smart enough to carry this out without getting busted-Jerry has a lot to gain if Emily's gone-seems he did some careful planning. And please don't crack down on me-every one has their thought and feelings about this trial-One last note: who ever did murder Emily will pay the ultimate price with our Lord....
Tinkerbell - Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking on you or what you think it's just that the common sense you talk about is not involved when you use your gut.
I think it's very possible that the hispanic workers could have killed Emily and are covering it up by pointing the finger at Jerry. I also think a scorned lover could have killed Emily. Could Jerry have killed her, obviously the answer is yes. But if we look at all the facts that were presented objectively then their are serious flaws in any attempt to place the blame on Jerry.
Did he act odd at times during the investigation, sure but who wouldn't look a little odd under the microscope especially if their spouse went missing and then turned up dead.
Again nothing against you or your comments Tink but if my life were on the line I want people to take the gut out of the equation and look at the facts objectively.
From the evidence presented by the defense and the lack of evidence presented by the prosecution I can not see how Jerry could have committed this murder...my brain says not guilty!
Post a Comment
<< Home