<< Back to the Story

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Ten to 2

Ten to two is the split. But the foreperson was instructed not to say toward guilt or innocence.

14 Comments:

Blogger Twyla said...

Has anyone considered the fact that another woman could have been seen around the truck during the time it was parked in SC? Maybe the person the ladies at the motel saw was not actually Emily Anderson, but someone who resembled her in build and hair color.

July 19, 2007 at 12:20 PM  
Blogger Confused said...

EA was found in the same clothes she was last seen in...so it had to be someone close to the same description.

July 19, 2007 at 12:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

July 19, 2007 at 12:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone has considered everything by now...
that would be the whole issue...
WE DO NOT KNOW -
Due to lack of a weapon, blood/DNA and/or an eyewitness we are all left to fabricate the best story we can come up with it...
That should not be evidence enough to send anyone to death row.

My OPINION - its 10-2 in favor of acquital...

July 19, 2007 at 12:31 PM  
Blogger craig said...

I agree hudson-ite

July 19, 2007 at 12:32 PM  
Blogger mkendra19939 said...

I agree with alot of people. The CCSD didnt do there job correctly. I think they rush in this case.

July 19, 2007 at 12:35 PM  
Blogger scuba-lover said...

Why does Hudson-ite believe the split is 10-2 in favor of an aquital?

July 19, 2007 at 12:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

July 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is my OPINION based on the lack of evidence to prove guilt BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT...

July 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM  
Blogger skyeblogger said...

OKAY-who besides me is ready for this entire mess to be OVER??? I completly agree with hudson-ite...everyone and everything has been considered and RECONSIDERED MANY TIMES BY NOW...and the jury obviously CANNOT AGREE...AND I do agree that at least it SHOULD be 10-2 for aquittal for one SIMPLE REASON-LISTIN CLOSELY-THE STATE DID NOT PROVE IT'S CASE! I say MISTRIAL.

July 19, 2007 at 12:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey there Skyeblogger,

I am ready to end this as well...

I have posted a legal explanation of the "hung-jury" in the comments under the last post from Jen. Men.

Check it out...

July 19, 2007 at 12:53 PM  
Blogger scuba-lover said...

I think everyone is ready to see this mess over and done. If the CCSD knew how to handle an actual murder trial, I don't think we would have seen this dragged out for so long. We are definitely not dealing with CSI!! These small town boys don't have the training required to fully investigate this type of crime. However, I don't think anyone wants to see a guilty man walk free or an innocent man be put to death. It's a shame it was not handled better in the first place!

July 19, 2007 at 12:58 PM  
Blogger interested said...

Does anyone know if Jerry's friends or family were questioned about their where abouts from the time EA went missing until the time she was found in the truck?
Could there be an accomplice?

July 19, 2007 at 1:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There COULD BE anything...

July 19, 2007 at 1:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home